TECHNET Archives

January 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:07:00 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jose A Rios <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: IPC-TM-2.1.1 Microscetioning, Manual Method Rev E
From:
Jose A Rios <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
That was on purpose, to strip any kind of stated, inferred or implied performance or workmanship acceptance criteria appearing in test methods, and defer to acceptance criteria stated in performance specs only.

> On Jan 3, 2018, at 9:06 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> 
> Fellow TechNetters:
> 
>   I am reviewing the above stated IPC-Test Method.   In sections 5.3.7 and 5.4, I DO NOT see reference to IPC-A-600, Acceptability of Printed Wire Boards.   It has more QUALITY photos there than the reference IPC-MS-810.   The same hold true for TM 2.6.8,   2.6.27
> 
> Victor,

ATOM RSS1 RSS2