TECHNET Archives

December 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Showers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wayne Showers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:41:56 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2 lines)
Another thought that may allow for recovery of the assembly/assemblies and goes hand in hand with what has already been posited is to procure a 2 - 2.5 mil stencil.  1st pass with an ORH0/ORH1 or similarly aggressive paste (Alpha WS698CPS is SAC305), Indium has Indium3.2/Indium3.2HF in SAC and Indium6.3 is Tin/Lead.  Pass the PCB only through reflow with a long & low preheat and then spike to burn off the flux.  *You must wash the PCB then.  Using the same stencil, a second pass with your preferred paste would be in order.  Based off of our blind side-by-side, re-run with an Indium paste.  Since you will be building up solder layer with the first pass, the stencil needs to be thinner on the second pass or you will have extensive solder balling.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2