Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 6 Dec 2017 20:19:21 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Distance I stay away can depend on what the keep-out area actually is. If coating near a connector that I know is prone to wicking, for example, I'll program to stay a little farther away than I will from something less critical.
Ryan Elson
Manufacturing Engineer
Bently Nevada
Baker Hughes, a GE company
Cell: 775-790-5182
[log in to unmask]
1631 Bently Parkway South
Minden, NV 89423, United States
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of lduso - Diamond-MT.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 11:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXT: Re: [TN] IPC-CC-830 (Conformal Coat)
As Doug says, whatever you want that meets your needs. It is not by any means necessary to design in a "dmz of coating" but you can. And it will be greatly appreciated by your coater.
Honestly, from receiving hundreds of different drawings/specs for coating application, the predominant call-out is ..... nothing. Most drawings and specs only call-out what is to be coating free. For example "Coat board with IPC -830 approved UR, do not coat J1-J7 and all played mount holes."
It's up to me to decide how close to J1 to get with the coating. I once coated the leads of all the fine-pitch connectors and the customer said that was too close. The next customer will reject the work if I don't coat the leads.
On Dec 6, 2017 10:18 AM, "Jack Olson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I don't know what staking is, and I think they are trying to avoid
> masking/demasking.
> The goal is to spray everything except the mounting holes and a few
> exposed metal areas that we are using for thermal reasons.
> I was told I need to leave an "overspray zone" as neutral territory
> between those two types of areas
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Staking? Masking / De-masking?
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
> > *Date:* 6 December 2017 at 10:48:41 PM SGT
> > *To:* [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> > *Subject:* [TN] IPC-CC-830 (Conformal Coat)
> >
> > What should a designer use as an "overspray zone" for conformal coating?
> > I would like to keep components and vias away from areas that will
> > NOT be coated.
> > I don't know why 3mm sticks in my mind, but I can't find anything in
> > IPC-CC-830 about it
> > (including the new Working Draft)
> > I also downloaded the new Conformal Coat ebook from 007 and can't
> > find it there, either!
> >
>
|
|
|