TECHNET Archives

December 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: IPC-CC-830 (Conformal Coat)
From:
Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:12:06 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Staking? Masking / De-masking?

________________________________

From: Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 6 December 2017 at 10:48:41 PM SGT
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [TN] IPC-CC-830 (Conformal Coat)

What should a designer use as an "overspray zone" for conformal coating?
I would like to keep components and vias away from areas that will NOT be
coated.
I don't know why 3mm sticks in my mind, but I can't find anything in
IPC-CC-830 about it
(including the new Working Draft)
I also downloaded the new Conformal Coat ebook from 007 and can't find it
there, either!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2