Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:25:31 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have still used MELF components but only diodes where no suitable alternative was available for protection circuitry in ATEX/IECEx designs.
If the manufacturer has a recommended footprint then I've used that: a couple of these did have U shaped cut-outs. Otherwise I've used rounded-rectangular pads as calculated by PCB Libraries for nominal density. I have never had any feedback from the assembler about any issues and never seen any issues with skewed components.
Regards,
James
James Head
Oxford Instruments
Magnetic Resonance
www.oxford-instruments.com
www.twitter.com/oxinst : @oxinst
www.facebook.com/oxinst
www.linkedin.com/company/oxford-instruments
Tubney Woods, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5QX, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 1865 393200
Email: [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack Olson
Sent: 04 December 2017 16:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: -|EXT|- [DC] MELF Land Patterns
I am using MELF components on my current design, which I haven't seen much this century.
But I remember way back when we used "U-shaped" land shapes.
I notice the current Land Pattern standard (IPC-7351) recommends rectangular, but at least one person has wondered if we should use U-shaped "just in case".
I generally resist that kind of philosophy unless there is science behind it.
Is anyone using U-shaped pads anymore?
(Is anyone using MELFs anymore? (smile))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0.
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL) For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+++Scanned for Viruses by ForcePoint+++
___________________________________________________________________________This e-mail is confidential and is for the addressee only. Please refer to www.oxinst.com/email-statement for regulatory information.
|
|
|