TECHNET Archives

November 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 18:09:18 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
So your plan seems rather thorough to me. I am assuming  you are about to  launch an effort that  will study several coatings. 

Some related thoughts may include:
> Be sure you have a good handle on what you coverage expectations are. Especially  for components.
> If coatings are to be diluted with thinner , don't under estimate the impact that the  degree of dilution with thinner can have on numerous performance attributes. 
> if you are looking at 2 part  coatings  be sure that you are aware of the pot-life of your mix and  control to it during you evaluation. 
> if masking will be required the  targeted assemblies be sure you  look for coating masking  interactions .  Lifting of  tape edges, ease of demasking, dewetting caused near masked area's unique to certain  coating types. 

Rich  Kraszewski 
Senior Staff Process Engineer
Plexus Engineering Solutions 


* * * * * * * * CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE * * * * * * * *

This e-mail and any attachments are confidential from Plexus Corp. and may contain information which is privileged, confidential, and/or protected by non-disclosure agreements.  They are intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s).  .  Any unauthorized use or disclosure may be unlawful.  If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, disclose, retain or reproduce all or any part of the information contained in this e-mail or any attachments If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately by return e-mail or by calling + 1 888 208 9005.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Elson, Ryan(BHGE)
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 4:49 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Conformal Coating qualification

Hello all,

We are looking at qualifying a new conformal coating, and have a number of requirements for manufacturability and inherent properties, meets IPC-CC-830 requirements, certain CTI rating, etc., and we have put together a lengthy test plan that includes different types of boards, including those with sensitive circuitry, boards with low surface energies, and the like. But I wanted to see what other industry standards we need to check and make sure we're not missing anything.

I think SIR testing with our existing solder paste & wave flux is the big one, and I was planning to use B-24 test coupons. We are also doing adhesion testing, checking against IPC-A-610 requirements, HASS testing, final testing, as well as various checks for manufacturability (such as viscosity and ability to coat with our selective spray equipment, good wetting at lower surface energies, ease of rework).

What else are we missing? Any other IPC test methods or compatibility checks to be concerned with?

Thanks!
Ryan Elson
Manufacturing Engineer
Bently Nevada
Baker Hughes, a GE company
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2