TECHNET Archives

November 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
IPC TechNet Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:29:04 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Nano Coatings
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
Based on personnel experience or even word of mouth,....which  "nano " coating manufacturer would I  be amiss not to include in an evaluation?

I do realize that any comments would not  be considered endorsements of a manufacturers product.

If you  asked me for what specific application/sector, my answer would be "yes".   Which basically  means YTBD, but  more a less a competitor to CC830  coating types  in general.

Any inputs would be appreciated.
Please feel free to  reply  off this forum.

Rich  Kraszewski
Senior Staff Process Engineer
Plexus Engineering Solutions

ATOM RSS1 RSS2