TECHNET Archives

October 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D
Date:
Tue, 31 Oct 2017 13:25:38 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
This has always been a very confusing topic, Dave. Thanks.

But I still don't see why they cannot be combined into a single document. 



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Hillman

Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 3:22 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Plated Through Hole, PTH, annular ring solder wetting with component lead



Hi team - Just a point of clarification as I see this point pop up with some frequency. The requirements for a printed circuit assembly are in the

IPC-JSTD-001 specification and the Workmanship Criteria reflecting those requirement as in the IPC-A-610.  I know if sounds mundane and lots of folks typically cite the 610 specification as the "requirements"  since that is what the operators/auditors have in their hands but using specific document clarity is important in our industry. We have tons of requirements and criteria so citing 001/610 correctly and as a set can be super beneficial for everyone. Sorry for the soapbox, just trying to be positive and proactive.



Dave Hillman

Rockwell Collins





On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Stadem, Richard D <[log in to unmask]

> wrote:



> You nailed it Jerry! Thanks from all of us.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jerry Dengler

> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 2:41 PM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [TN] Plated Through Hole, PTH, annular ring solder 

> wetting with component lead

>

> Victor,

>

> See IPC-A-610F.

> Section 7.3.5 Supported Holes - Solder This addresses all of the 

> requirements including "Source Side" and "Destination Side" land area 

> coverage.

>

> Jerry

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of 

> [log in to unmask]

> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 3:34 PM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: [TN] Plated Through Hole, PTH, annular ring solder wetting 

> with component lead

>

> Fellow TechNetters:

>

>    Where within the all IPC and other industry Standards can I locate 

> information on PTH annular ring solder wetting on side 1, component

> side, and side 2 solder side.   Does PTH annular ring solder wetting

> REQUIRED in TODAY"S fast pace assemblies.

>

> Victor,.

>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2