Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:45:45 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Dave, thanks. Just double confirm as they keep coming back that it is possible.
________________________________
From: David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 6 September 2017 at 10:21:29 PM SGT
To: Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>, TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [TN] TML vs WVR
Hi GA Tan - nope, the WVR should not be higher than the TML unless someone is re-writing physics. Possible issues could be; (1) incorrectly measurement/procedure; (2) loss of an outgassing product in the sample that is not being accounted for. Correctly testing and measuring moisture weight loss is not a simple task, it takes a very rigid procedure to obtain valid numbers.
Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Dear All,
Can WVR (water vapour regained) having a higher value than TML(total mass loss)? I told supplier's "NO" unless the testing might be done incorrectly at difference conditions.
Please do share with me, your thought. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
GA Tan
|
|
|