TECHNET Archives

September 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:45:45 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi Dave, thanks. Just double confirm as they keep coming back that it is possible.

________________________________

From: David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 6 September 2017 at 10:21:29 PM SGT
To: Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>, TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [TN] TML vs WVR

Hi  GA Tan - nope, the WVR should not be higher than the TML unless someone is re-writing physics. Possible issues could be; (1) incorrectly measurement/procedure; (2) loss of an outgassing product in the sample that is not being accounted for. Correctly testing and measuring moisture weight loss is not a simple task, it takes a very rigid procedure to obtain valid numbers.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Dear All,
              Can WVR (water vapour regained) having a higher value than TML(total mass loss)? I told supplier's "NO" unless the testing might be done incorrectly at difference conditions.
              Please do share with me, your thought. Thanks in advance.

Best Regards
GA Tan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2