TECHNET Archives

August 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A
Date:
Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:13:08 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Does it need to be epoxy or can you use a polyurethane? If you can go to a polyurethane take a look at Imron(r). Properly applied the stuff is bulletproof, even survives on hill climber frames.



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls

Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:16 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Epoxy Paint



Message received from outside the Battelle network. Carefully examine it before you open any links or attachments.



Graham,

Those of us in the aerospace world have to live with two documents, the FAA

DO-160 and an equivalent mil spec (either 883 or 810). Both have what is

called a fluid susceptibility test section.  Depending on the customer,

there is a wide range of fluids that the material must be resistant to.

Our avionics assemblies can be anywhere in the plane, cockpit, avionics

bay, luggage bay, under the toilets, in the wings, up in the tail, outside

the aircraft.  Can be anywhere.  For hydraulic fluid, yes we are primarily

concerned about drips and leaks from hydraulic lines.  Some customers what

the paints and coatings to be "bulletproof" and know that if a material can

stand up to hydraulic fluid, it will stand up to everything else.





Doug Pauls

Principal Materials and Process Engineer

Rockwell Collins



On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Graham Naisbitt <

[log in to unmask]> wrote:



> Hi Doug

>

> I recall being asked the question regarding our (then) coatings and their

> ability to resist Skydrol.

>

> When I enquired why, I was informed that the electronic circuits were in

> the cockpit, and they were worried about the effects on them if Skydrol

> were to “leak” onto them.

>

> I had to ask why this would be important given that the pilot had already

> ejected to safety if that happened.

>

> I don’t believe that anyone found a Skydrol resistant paint or coating but

> can’t Eastman help you?

>

> ATB - Graham

>

> > On 21 Aug 2017, at 22:06, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

> wrote:

> >

> > Good afternoon all,

> >

> > Do any of you know a good epoxy-based paint that is resistant to

> Skydrol, a

> > nasty phosphate based hydraulic fluid?

> >

> > Doug Pauls

> > Principal Materials and Process Engineer

> > Rockwell Collins

>

>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2