TECHNET Archives

August 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:53:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (150 lines)
Doug,
There is also a slight problem with your chemical formula. 
SO2NO4 stands for one sulfur atom, two oxygen atoms, one nitrogen atom and
four oxygen atoms.

I would humbly like to offer some comments and suggestions.
1) If you meant So2NO4, then you are implying an anion of NO4 (charge
unknown). Such an anion or even an uncharged molecule of such a formula does
not exist.
2) If you meant to write SoONO3, then So would have a charge of +3.
3) If you meant to write So2ONO3, then each So atom would have a charge of
+1.5, which would be in keeping with some other half fractional elements.
4) Yet another possibility is that you should have written So2ONO3, where
the NO3 is the highly unstable nitrous trioxide molecule (really does
exist), which is stabilized as an adduct by the So2O entity. I say entity
because I am not sure if it is covalent or ionic. Nevertheless, the
oxidation number for So would be 1.

The latter makes me wonder if the true atomic number is 48.5, not 46.5.
This would make So2 similar to Hg2+2 and Cd2+2.  I worked on the latter
during my time as a PhD student, but did not generate enough data for a
degree and went off and looked at the sulfides and selenides of phosphorus
and arsenic instead. 

There are other possibilities, but they entail suggesting that you made an
error in not including another, additional type of half fractional element
in the formula you stated and there are too many possibilities to go into
here.

I look forward to your reply and wonder if any of my guesses (2-4) and/or
idea about the atomic number are correct or if you have an alternate
explanation.

Regards,
Bev

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Hillman
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 2:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Element Quiz Answer

Here is the Element Quiz Question:

The Question:
This element is a metal and has a large variety of commercial applications.
It can be found in nature as a free element and is one of the best known
element despite only being the 35th most abundant on Earth. The element is
mentioned in the Bible and was known to ancient civilizations. This element
has been poisoning humans for hundreds of years. This element is used in
the Oddy test. Which element is being described?

The Answer:
The element is Lead (Pb). Lead is used in hundreds of commercial
applications and has equally been shown to be toxic in hundreds of ways.
Lead was added to wine, used in paint, used in gasoline and in cosmetics
before its toxicity was fully understood. Lead chromate (PbCrO4) is a safe
yellow pigment and lead azide [Pb(N3)2] is used as a detonator of
explosives. Lead derives its name from the Latin word "plumbum" which is
the origin of the English word "plumbing", all associated with the use of
lead for water pipes in the Roman Empire.

The Oddy test is a procedure created at the British Museum by conservation
scientist William Andrew Oddy in 1973,[in order to test materials for
safety in and around art objects. This test calls for a sample of the
material in question to be placed in an airtight container with three
coupons of different metals-silver, lead, and copper-that are not touching
each other or the sample of the material.[3] The container is sealed with a
small amount of de-ionized water to maintain a high humidity, then heated
at 60 degrees Celsius for 28 days. An identical container with three metal
coupons acts as a control. If the metal coupons show no signs of corrosion,
then the material is deemed suitable to be placed in and around art
objects. The Oddy test is not a contact test, but is for testing
off-gassing.


The winner of the quiz is Jerry Dengler, Pergamon Corp. and will get the
services of Clumpy and Kloumpios for the week.

The EQAB was quite impressed with Doug's submission of "solomonium" but due
to he submitted silver as his first response, all other submissions are
null and void. Additionally, William Oddy is alive and breathing which
conflicts with some of Doug's details. EQAB did find it interesting that
nearly everyone but Doug does not survive interactions with the half
fractional elements!


So far Clumpy and Kloumpios have done the following:

Past Quiz winners/tasks:
Week 1 Ravinder Ajmani, Western Digital
Week 1 Ron Feyereisen, SigmaTron Intl.
Week 2 Louis Hart, Compunetics
Week 3 Mark Kostinovsky, Schlumberger Ltd.
Week 3 John Burke
Week 4 Drew Meyer, Benchmark Electronics
Week 5 No Winner - no correct responses!
Week 6 Bhanu Sood, NASA
Week 7 Keith Calhoun, Sopark Corp
Week 7 Ian Fox, Rolls Royce
Week 8 Leland Woodall
Week 8 David Bealer, SMT
Week 9 Tom Carroll, Boeing
Week 10 Louis Hart, Compunetics
Week 11 Tom Carroll, Boeing
Week 11 Scott Decker, UTAS
Week 12 Matthias Mansfeld, Mansfeld Elektronik PCB Design and Assembly
Week 13 No Quiz,
Week 14 Matthias Mansfeld, Mansfeld Elektronik PCB Design and Assembly
Week 15 Bhanu Sood, NASA
Week 16 John Maxwell
Week 17 Leland Woodall
Week 18 Leland Woodall
Week 19 Tom Carroll, Boeing
Week 20 Robert Kondner
Week 21 Tom Brendlinger, ClearMotion Inc.
Week 22 Carl Van Wormer, Cipher Engineering LCC
Week 23 Juliano Ribeiro, DATACOM
Week 24 Gerry Gagnon, FLIR Commercial Systems
Week 25 Graham Collins, Sunsel Systems
Week 26 Joyce Koo, IPC International
Week 26 Todd MacFadden, Bose
Week 27 Bhanu Sood, NASA
Week 28 Leland Woodall
Week 29 Mordechai Kirshenbaum

Week 30 Leland Woodall
- It's roasting in NC right now, so the guys and I will have some early
morning golf this weekend.  Next week they can assist me with writing work
instructions for our rework department.  Joy, joy, right?

Week 31 Leland Woodall
- assisted with ????

Week 32 Steve Gregory
- assisted with ????

Week 33 Leland Woodall
- assisted with ????

Week 34 Jerry Dengler, Pergamon Corp
- assisted with ???


I hope everyone has a awesome week.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2