TECHNET Archives

June 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:48:57 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
I am considering requesting capital for an additional or replacement XrF system, but would like to go in armed with a short list of particular models and costs and be confident of their performance records and capabilities. The least important factor is cost, so don't hold back from sending me a confidential email on your choice.
The machine should be able to accurately determine the percentage of gold, silver, tin, nickel, lead, copper, etc., down to the .001% level in order to confirm that the plating on incoming component leads meets the component print or requirements.
It should also be able to accurately determine the metallurgic make-up of any given metal sample. Is that asking a lot? I don't know.
I prefer a hand-held, but if what I am looking for is only available in a base machine package, then that will have to work.
No information you folks provide will be shared. Feel free to send me an email at either [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> or [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>.
I sincerely appreciate any information you can share with me.

Thanks
R. Dean Stadem

ATOM RSS1 RSS2