TECHNET Archives

June 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:11:41 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Victor
Google returns any number of different products when searching on your title
phrase. You might need to be more specific. Would also help to know what
flux type you are wanting to clean off.
Having said that if you are doing destructive testing then you are free from
a lot of restraints on material choice. You're not worried about things like
long term SIR etc., so you can use anything that doesn't interfere with
preparing a x-section.

  ---


Regards


Mike 

www.chrisfennerfund.org  

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
[log in to unmask]
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 12:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Heavy Duty LF No Clean Flux Remover

Fellow TechNetters:

   Anyone out there with personal experience in the use of Heavy Duty LF No
Clean Flux Remover, aerosol/liquid.   Product will be used to soak BGAs once
removed from motherboard in preparation for cross sectioning,   The BGAs
were reworked twice, 2xRW.   All comments/suggestion welcomed.

Victor,

ATOM RSS1 RSS2