TECHNET Archives

May 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 May 2017 14:02:23 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Greetings Pradeep-

What impedance formula are you using? For traveling wave impedance, the common formulas don't have copper area in them. (They do have width and thickness, so you could calculate area, but your context seems to be the copper area on something like a ground plane)

Wayne Thayer

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pradeep Menon
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 9:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Copper area for impedance calculations

Dear All

Wanted a little more clarity on the copper area that is usually considered for inner layers while calculating impedance. Is it copper area in individual circuit or copper area for each layer after panelisation. There can be instances wherein the two can have quite a good difference which may result in dielectric variation and hence the impedance calculations also.

Can you please suggest what is the commonly followed practice.

Rgds

Pradeep
Kindly note: Our domain name has changed to micropack.in from micro-pack.com, please update my email-id in your address book with the new domain name - micropack.in

[Logo]<http://www.micropack.in>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2