TECHNET Archives

May 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 16 May 2017 17:58:56 -0400
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, George Wenger <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: IMC Formation Thickness in OSP
From:
George Wenger <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
Victor,

I haven't seen and TechNetter responses but I'll give you my two cents.  The
IMC thickness numbers you heard sound much too high.  I think the IMC
thickness should be half as thick as those numbers.


Regards,
George Wenger



-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
[log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 8:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] IMC Formation Thickness in OSP

Fellow TechNetters:

   What is the acceptable guideline for IMC Formation thickness on OSP after
2x rework..   IPC-4555 is still pending.  I've heard of 3-5 microns on first
pass and 5-10 microns on 2x RW.   All comments/suggestions welcomed.

Victor,

ATOM RSS1 RSS2