TECHNET Archives

April 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Brendlinger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Tom Brendlinger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:04:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Victor, are you doing via in pad with these PTH's, or are these on the
other side of a mask dam from the BGA ball?

If not, your main problems would be entrapped chemistry and the possibility
of protruding fill/plug material interfering with the assembly process. You
also have the mask fill manufacturing issues discussed a few months ago on
the designercouncil list, where a few people described issues getting
manufacturers up to speed and guaranteeing sufficient fill.

If you are doing Via in pad, you're likely to have entrapped chemistry,
head on pillow, entrapped air causing thermal expansion issues,
incompletely filled vias causing solder thieving... and probably more. I
don't recommend it without a lot of experimentation and representative
coupon microsections.

Tom

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> HOP if not done properly.
> > CON - creates a flux trap leading to corrosion
> >
> > ------------------------
> > Ed Hare
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Apr 7, 2017, at 8:14 AM, <[log in to unmask]>
> >> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Fellow TechNetters:
> >>
> >>   What are the PROS and CONS on inadequate, partial, small PTH
> >> fill/plugging under BGA?
> >>
> >> Victor,
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2