TECHNET Archives

March 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:14:26 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
It is this Bow & Twist season again.
I often wonder whether someone really measured Bow & Twist on assembled boards. If yes, wonder how it was done as both sides are already populated with components. 

~wee mei~
________________________________________
From: TechNet [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Joyce Koo [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 3:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] IPC-TM-650, 2.4.22, Bow & Twist

it depends your design. if you have some small parts in the max bow area,
it may flight out upon installation... (1) your PCB should compliant with
bow and twist with simulated reflow - how many time you reflow, including
rework if it required (2) your PCA depend upon what you how you want to
install or support points and what is density and type of parts... better
not be Gyro... those need really flat ;-).
> Fellow TechNetters:
>
>    Does the above stated TM applies to raw cards ONLY?   Is there a
> standard for PCBA?
>
> Victor,
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2