TECHNET Archives

March 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Mar 2017 10:24:23 -0800
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ken Harp <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: MIL spec for resistors
From:
Ken Harp <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines) 
http://quicksearch.dla.mil/

Search for "55342" under the "Document Number" field.

R/

Ken Harp
Mechanical Design Engineer

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017, at 10:09 AM, Tom Brendlinger wrote:
> Ken,
> I believe thick film resistors are covered by MIL-PRF-55342.
> Additionally,
> I believe that Panasonic's ERJ parts are not qualified to that standard.
> 
> Tom Brendlinger, CID
> Electrical Engineer
> Clearmotion Inc
> 
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Ken Barton <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello Technet gurus,
> >
> > As I'm wading thru the HIS site for MIL specs for ERJ thick film
> > resistors, can you tell me if such a MIL spec exists?
> >
> > Thanks always,
> >
> > Ken Barton CID
> > Technical Designer,
> > Avionics HW
> >
> > Blue Origin, LLC
> > 21218 76th Avenue S.
> > Kent, WA 98032 (253) 437-5625 x625
> > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2