TECHNET Archives

December 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:14:32 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
Hi Phil - oh, if I could only have an 90 mil board with 2 oz copper layers!
I routinely see pwb designs, primarily power supplies, which are 60  mils
 - 120 mil with 2, 3 or 4 oz internal layers. As your detailed, soldering
can be "an adventure" with these designs. A selective solder process is
your friend as it has the thermal mass to permit adequate soldering of the
PTH components.  There are many of these types of designs that manual
soldering is no longer a valid option (IMHO). You may have some luck with
reducing the number of internal layer connections and or how the PTH is
connected to the internal layer to make soldering slightly better. Good
luck.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]


On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Nutting, Phil <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> We have several designs in which we use the thru-hole pad and surrounding
> etch to act as a heat sink for device heat being transmitted via the
> component leads.  Typically 2 ounce copper and often on 0.090" thick FR-4
> boards.  With the added copper thickness and larger pad area for better
> "heat sinking" we now introduce greater difficulty in getting a quality
> solder joint and don't get me started on the increased difficulty in
> removing a bad component.
>
> So my questions are:
> Is this a common practice?
> Does it really provide effective device heat sinking?
>
> Phil Nutting  |  HVP Development Engineer   |  Excelitas Technologies Corp
>
> Lab: +1 978.224.4332   |  Office: +1 978.224.4152
> 35 Congress St, Salem, MA  01970 USA
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> www.excelitas.com<http://www.excelitas.com/>
>
>
> [Excelitas R_emailsig]
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
> ________________________________
> This email message and any attachments are confidential and proprietary to
> Excelitas Technologies Corp. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> message, please inform the sender by replying to this email or sending a
> message to the sender and destroy the message and any attachments. Thank
> you.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2