TECHNET Archives

December 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Gumpert, Ben" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Gumpert, Ben
Date:
Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:36:06 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Paul,

There is no conflict. One frequency is in the context of a documented process control plan and one is not.

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul Pidgeon
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:03 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: [TN] pull testing

Hi All

First time I've published a question on this forum!!! & a question I've been meaning to ask for a while, with regards to IPC/WHMA-A-620B.  

 

On the test section, page 19-10, it states - 'crimp tools are not to be used for longer than 30 days between verification testing', & on page 19-14, it states - 'when using hand crimp tools, the testing interval SHALL be once per day for each combination of tool, wire & contact'.

Is this not a contradiction? or am I miss interpreting? 

Regards

Paul

 

Paul Pidgeon [Certified IPC Trainer]



'STEM Training'

* +44 (0)7912 077445

*  <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]

www.stemtraining.co.uk

This e-mail is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should notify me immediately and delete it.
You should not copy, print, distribute, disclose or use any part of it. I cannot accept any liability for viruses transmitted via this e-mail once it has left my system.

 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2