TECHNET Archives

November 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 13 Nov 2016 17:34:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
I am not the most knowledgeable but suggest that routing of the edges of a
PCB is hell on the material and toiling slop in the routing is more than
that copper to copper spacing. Copper to coper and route tooling are totally
different animals.

Bob K.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Yehuda Weisz
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 5:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Copper to edge distance

Hello  Technetters,
For the beginning of the week I have a question to you that occupies me more
and more lately, and it concerns one of the design guidelines - "distance of
copper to edge".

IPC-2221 specifies the minimum distance by design as 20 mils and raises this
value as the voltage drop increases.
Well, as PCBs become more and more dense, it becomes a very challenging task
to convince designers to give up real-estate along the edges of the board.
Their claim - if the manufacturer can work with a tolerance of +/-0.1mm, why
do I need to keep a clearance of 0.5 mm along the edges.
Most of the boards we are dealing with are for high reliability customers
(class 2, class 3 type guys) and from what I have heard from other designers
- no one goes below 20 mil. Some even keep a minimum of 40 mil along the
edges.

So - my question to you is simply - WHY ???
Why did the spec. call for 20 mil minimum clearance??
I do give reasons to the designers, involving reliability and so on but I
feel that I might be missing the real point (or the fundamental reason).

Could any/some of you, knowledgeable people, help me out on this??

Thanks,
Yehuda Weisz

ATOM RSS1 RSS2