TECHNET Archives

November 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: IPC Test
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:09:55 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
Or Lions and Vikings.....sigh.



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls

Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 9:28 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] IPC Test



Nope.  Two different tests, two different methodologies, two different kinds of equipment.  You are comparing a banana and a kangaroo here....





Doug Pauls

Principal Materials and Process Engineer Rockwell Collins



On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:23 AM, <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



> Fellow TechNetters:

>

>    According to IPC STD is SIR and Board Cleanliness the same test 

> with the same equipment..

>

> Victor,

>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2