TECHNET Archives

October 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:46:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 lines)
(1) spectra didn't show energy range of Ni. Cu, etc.  no e-beam energy
either... hard to tell how deep is the signal come from.
(2) specimen is finished smt, you need to analyze the virgin part... don't
know those non-wetting area was contaminated with flux or not.
(3) based on 1 and 2, the sem and edx didn't means anything in terms of FA.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2