TECHNET Archives

September 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, John Burke <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:19:56 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Agreed. The cost is neglible.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Burke
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 7:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] J-STD-001 Space Addendum

Xray every one of them.

Best regards,

John Burke
 

> On Sep 19, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Joey Rios <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Sections 7.5.14, 15 and 16 outlines inspection of hidden solder joints, invoking the use of X-Ray in the Space Addendum. The standard does not explicitly prescribe a sampling extent, so, if an assembly has dozens of the same device, like 50-100 say of such devices (such as a bottom termination component) on a single PWA, is the expectation (J-STD intent) that each of the replicate devices are inspected by X-Ray?? Is that what the industry practices, or is sampling commonly invoked, since the processing of the board is the same for the entire PWA??

ATOM RSS1 RSS2