 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:19:56 +0000 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Agreed. The cost is neglible.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Burke
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 7:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] J-STD-001 Space Addendum
Xray every one of them.
Best regards,
John Burke
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Joey Rios <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Sections 7.5.14, 15 and 16 outlines inspection of hidden solder joints, invoking the use of X-Ray in the Space Addendum. The standard does not explicitly prescribe a sampling extent, so, if an assembly has dozens of the same device, like 50-100 say of such devices (such as a bottom termination component) on a single PWA, is the expectation (J-STD intent) that each of the replicate devices are inspected by X-Ray?? Is that what the industry practices, or is sampling commonly invoked, since the processing of the board is the same for the entire PWA??
|
|
|
