TECHNET Archives

August 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Thayer - EXT <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wayne Thayer - EXT <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:21:38 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi All-

Finally back "in the saddle" after a tumultuous year. First, I got a fantastic job opportunity to move to the heart of the PNW. Worked my butt off for 7 months, then was let go. Then another sprint to see if I could find ANYTHING in the immediate area, which took another 2 months.

Anyway, here I am at Insitu, maker of premium recon/intelligence UAVs.

So here's the question:

IPC/WHMA-A-620B Table 14-1 lists different bend radii for "unshielded" vs "insulated (non-polyimide)" wires, but there is nothing in the "definitions" section to give me a clue as to how to tell the difference. Anybody know how we're supposed to interpret that? For the "S" version of the document, they pulled out the "insulated" line.

And here's a follow-up question:

Why isn't there anything on wire construction in the spec? The build-up of the wire makes a huge difference to whether a certain bend radius can damage a wire. For example, I'm looking at #12AWG, and I've found (#conductors/gauge each conductor) ranging from 19/25 to 665/40.

Thanks!


Wayne Thayer
Insitu Contract Engineer
Desk: xx-xxx-xxxx
Cell: 443-534-8036
E-mail:  [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2