TECHNET Archives

August 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:47:54 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hi Inge,



Been a while since I heard the term Mu-metal.  Very associated with noise suppression in tube equipment.



Drew



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Inge Hernefjord

Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:09 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] looking for medium resistance material



Gosh, TN isn't declining as I thought. Your challenge seems to place in a research  lab. When I ran into ssuch problems and the solution proposals grew until I couldn't decide which one to test (as usual you are expected to do the job over a night and with no money) then I use go back and ask myself if there might be another concept. Background noise is a plague and many a time nearly impossible to eliminate. Therefore I wonder if not the cheaapest and fastest way is to modify the noise source. B&O had a similar issue with their studio recorders. They eliminated the problem by encapsulate the motor in my-metal. The S/N lowered by one magnitude.  Just a thought. Labbing with various resistiviity stuff can be expensive a case.../Inge



On 9 August 2016 at 17:11, Carl Van Wormer <[log in to unmask]>

wrote:



> The longer story is (feel free to ignore this if you don't care about 

> the background details):

>

> My short term goal is to set up an experiment to see if a shield of 

> intermediate resistance will address my present condition.  We all 

> know that the major cause or problems is . . . solutions.

>

> The inherited problem system is used to transfer power (5W-10W) during 

> Phase 1 of operation, and to transfer acoustic signals (Piezo pickup, 

> 10kHz to 1MHz) daring Phase 2 of operation.  The 100 turn, 15mm 

> diameter coils were mounted inside of ferrite cup-cores with a gap 

> between the 2 halves of the cores.  One core-half was mounted in a 

> fixed aluminum housing, while the other was mounted in an aluminum 

> housing at the end of a rotating shaft (on axis) with a gap between the cores of about 1mm.

>

> I came in to solve a noise pickup problem on the received acoustic 

> signal which was caused by a VFD motor speed controller.  The symptoms 

> could be simulated on the bench by connecting a 3kHz, 5V signal 

> generator square wave to the rotating housing.  In the classic “fix 

> it, but don’t change hardly anything” request, I found that I could 

> shield the receiving coil (inside the core) with some copper foil tape 

> (leaving a gap to avoid the “shorted turn” effect).  This eliminated 

> the effect of the capacitive coupling on my test bench.  During the 

> implementation phase, I found that we still had some noise that was 

> traced to the capacitive coupling on the rotating (source) side.  

> Since the coils were not differential (one end of each was connected 

> to local ground), the asymmetrical coupling signal caused a current to 

> flow in the transmitting coil that magnetically coupled to the 

> receiving coil.  Adding a shield to the rotating coil addressed that noise injection method.  The system was pronounced “Good.”

>

> We have found that the Phase 1 power transfer efficiency is reduced in 

> the shielded systems.  Eddy current losses in the shield seem to be 

> the cause, so I’m looking for ways to reduce those losses in my 

> environment.  Raising the resistance of the shield material seems to 

> be a simple solution, as long as the resistance is low enough to provide effective shielding.

> Unfortunately, I’ve been unable to find some easy to acquire samples 

> of various resistive sheets to play with.  I was hoping to do some 

> easy experiments to see if my resistive based shielding approach 

> stands up to my first set of experiments before I started the process 

> of defining a material to be used.  I’ve found some conductive ABS 

> filament ( 

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.makergeeks.com

> _coabs3dfi10.html&d=CwIFaQ&c=qI44ipyoBm0hVwhmy07quvdiOJrWojxKI35ez1PFJ8U&r=HZgy48l2HWBqJDpR-HiPKjp95VqM-oQXPmkYZLVMvsY&m=2Kltqw4Q9aTjEqsGaI_UBTgPBVkMDZWnQDFo8GjJ22w&s=Y2ZkYLmy0oTLWywZdGSL-A0HuKDw8qUArO8gW4sQh2w&e= ) that might work if I can find somebody to print a plate and a method to electrically connect to it, but I don’t know a local friend with a 3-d printer.

>

> I’m still hoping for the sample kit of sheets of various resistivity 

> materials, but I haven’t found the right page in the Digi-Key catalog . . .

>

> Thanks for any suggestions,

> Carl

>

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.

> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 5:55 AM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [TN] looking for medium resistance material

>

> There is just about every type of material with just the right 

> properties you are looking for available as a 3d printing medium.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Fenner

> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 12:44 AM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [TN] looking for medium resistance material

>

> Very kind of you Inge, but this is not really my cup of tea these 

> days. I am aware that there are a number of suppliers of carbon based 

> inks and these can be tailored to produce desired sheet resistivity 

> ranges. That sort of thing is widely used on flex circuits and 

> additive (printed

> electronics) circuitry. I would think  internet searching should bring 

> up a good candidate list of suppliers in a few iterations . There is 

> cross over here to ESD protection products, so that would be a good search area also.

>

>   ---

> Regards

>

>

> Mike

>

> www.chrisfennerfund.org

> www.facebook.com/chrisfennerfund/

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Inge Hernefjord

> Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 10:37 AM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [TN] looking for medium resistance material

>

> Carl,

> when  I was active I used to contact  SemiAlloys. I needed certain 

> resistivity in lids for resistivity pulsed current seam welding of 

> small packages for missiles. We produced about 50,000  pcs from 

> SemiAlloys with

> He/Kr10 exp -10 with succcess.  Mike Fenner has more to say , I think..

> They are  extremly nice to cooperate with. Mike as well, despite he is 

> english.

>

> Semi Alloys Inc

>

> 888 S Columbus Ave

>

> Mount Vernon, NY 10550

>

> (914) 664-8318)

>

>

>

> Good Luck / Inge

>

>

> On 7 August 2016 at 05:40, Carl Van Wormer 

> <[log in to unmask]>

> wrote:

>

> > I usually want my physical structural resistances to be as low as 

> > possible

> > (conductors) or as high as possible (insulators).  Now I need an 

> > intermediate resistance, probably in the range of 100 to 1000 Ohms 

> > per square.  The application will be an electrostatic shield in an 

> > alternating field, hopefully balancing magnetic heating losses 

> > against capacitive shielding effectiveness.

> > I have never seen these materials offered from any of my normal 

> > sources, but I’m sure that there is something out there that will 

> > work.  It could be sheet materials, paints, or slightly conductive 

> > epoxies, or something else I haven’t thought of.  Since there is a 

> > very wide experience base on this site, I’m asking here first.

> > Any suggestions will be appreciated.

> >

> > Thanks,

> > Carl

> >

> >

> > ​​​​​

> >

> > Carl B. Van Wormer, P.E., AE7GD

> > Senior Hardware Engineer

> > Cipher Engineering LLC

> >     21195 NW Evergreen Pkwy Ste 209

> >     Hillsboro, OR  97124-7167

> >     503-617-7447x303

> >     [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cipherengineerin

> > g.com&d=CwIFaQ&c=qI44ipyoBm0hVwhmy07quvdiOJrWojxKI35ez1PFJ8U&r=HZgy4

> > 8l2HWBqJDpR-HiPKjp95VqM-oQXPmkYZLVMvsY&m=2Kltqw4Q9aTjEqsGaI_UBTgPBVk

> > MDZWnQDFo8GjJ22w&s=dMBT6QlK9T4sE3Ip5GFDjIUpFBLBGdqSiF_o3PdX0mY&e= 

> > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cipherengineeri

> > ng.com_&d=CwIFaQ&c=qI44ipyoBm0hVwhmy07quvdiOJrWojxKI35ez1PFJ8U&r=HZg

> > y48l2HWBqJDpR-HiPKjp95VqM-oQXPmkYZLVMvsY&m=2Kltqw4Q9aTjEqsGaI_UBTgPB

> > VkMDZWnQDFo8GjJ22w&s=nZ5vCiC3GCRNBuw_ppMIR3xbH_lsz8xzwcyxdDP4Uwg&e= 

> > >

> >

> > This message may contain confidential and/or proprietary 

> > information, and is intended for the person/entity to whom it was 

> > originally addressed. Any use by others is strictly prohibited.  If 

> > I sent this to you by mistake, please be nice and delete it, and 

> > then tell me of my mistake so I can send it to the right person.

> >

> >

> >

>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2