TECHNET Archives

July 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Deng RongJun <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Deng RongJun <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jul 2016 02:14:55 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I also suspect that it caused by stress release. The shield may have residual stress, when go through high temperature, metal yield strength go down and make shield deformation.
Is there more information about the qualification process? 


Best regards
Deng
-----Original Message-----
From: Yuan-chia Joyce Koo [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 6:56 PM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Deng RongJun <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [TN] Shielding cans deformation during reflow

residual stress.  design and MFG  issues.  you should have co- planarity in dwg and spell out user condition before and after reflow simulation as part requirement.  and go through qualification process before hit production...  a vendor selection problem.
On Jul 6, 2016, at 2:39 AM, Deng RongJun wrote:

> Hello fellow Techies,
>
> I have got a problem with shielding cans deformation issue. There are 
> several kinds of shielding cans on board, we have found one shielding 
> have deformation after reflow, one side of shielding lift and not 
> solder on board.
> We also do a test, bake the individual shielding in oven with 230 
> degree, the shielding still have deformation and two corner have lift. 
> Take out the shielding from oven and temperature go down, then 
> shielding go back to good.
> Any one of you have experience on this case?
>
> Pictures:
> https://goo.gl/photos/xQLbFT1AEwTR2iV68
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best regards
> Deng

ATOM RSS1 RSS2