TECHNET Archives

June 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:22:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
John,

As others are stating there is no one "normal". Nortel (still waiting to see
if I get any of my pension), did 0 to 100C, 3000 cycles for long life
product.
Regards,
Bev 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Burke
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 12:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Thermal Cycle Testing

Good morning !!

 

A question came up on reliability testing.

 

Typically PCBA's are thermally cycled as a part of reliability testing
usually for 1000 cycles.

 

What is the group's experience for non-military thermal cycling ranges?.

 

I am often asked to use 0 - 100c sometimes -40 to 85c and sometimes various
other thermal cycles picked from the JEDEC standard.

 

What is the groups experience for this?. I am trying to establish "normal"
practice.

 

Best regards,

 

John



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2