TECHNET Archives

June 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:30:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Hi John - are we talking about thermal cycling of assemblies for solder
joint/design integrity or thermal cycling of boards for laminate integrity?
The IPC-9701 specification covers the thermal cycling of assemblies and is
commonly used.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]


On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:13 AM, John Burke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Good morning !!
>
>
>
> A question came up on reliability testing.
>
>
>
> Typically PCBA's are thermally cycled as a part of reliability testing
> usually for 1000 cycles.
>
>
>
> What is the group's experience for non-military thermal cycling ranges?.
>
>
>
> I am often asked to use 0 - 100c sometimes -40 to 85c and sometimes various
> other thermal cycles picked from the JEDEC standard.
>
>
>
> What is the groups experience for this?. I am trying to establish "normal"
> practice.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2