Correct. But I have seen a number of SIR tests, both my own and for
others, messed up because the as-purchased coupons were clean. Hence my
recommendation to pre-clean everything before starting.
Doug Pauls
Principal Materials and Process Engineer
Rockwell Collins
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Stadem, Richard D. <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Yessir!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Richard Kraszewski
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:02 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Industry Resources for IPC Test Boards
>
> Surface Insulation Resistance
>
> Rich Kraszewski
> (920) 969-6075
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Barton
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:47 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Industry Resources for IPC Test Boards
>
> SIR?
>
> Ken Barton
> Technical Designer,
> Vehicles & GSE/
> Avionics HW
>
> Blue Origin, LLC
> 21218 76th Avenue S.
> Kent, WA 98032
> (253) 437-5625 x625
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:45 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [Possible Spam] Re: [TN] Industry Resources for IPC Test Boards
> Importance: Low
>
> Especially if doing a SIR comb test.
>
> The Dark Eldar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:23 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Industry Resources for IPC Test Boards
>
> To some extent yes. But sometimes, if you are doing simple testing or
> screening experiments, commodity boards are OK. Just make sure you
> pre-clean them since you are never quite sure of what process they went
> through.
>
>
> Doug Pauls
> Principal Materials and Process Engineer Rockwell Collins
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > i thought you better use your own board house to get some reliable
> > data out of it.... (soldermask,board process if it is test for
> > performance or reliability, process control, etc). Am I wrong?
> > jk
> > On Jun 10, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Douglas Pauls wrote:
> >
> > That's because it is a tightly held secret. Ya has ta be a member of
> > the
> >> Kabal to get access.....
> >>
> >> I know the list you are talking about and last I saw it, the list had
> >> become seriously out of date, with half of the board shops no longer
> >> in existence.
> >>
> >> For me, since the Gerber files are readily available, I have our
> >> trusted suppliers make them. Although, one of our "trusted
> >> suppliers" mucked up my last batch of B-24 boards.
> >> I also know that Practical Components in California carries most of
> >> the major IPC boards. Russell Kido at Practical can fix you up.
> >>
> >>
> >> Doug Pauls
> >> Principal Materials and Process Engineer Rockwell Collins
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Richard Kraszewski <
> >> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>
> >> There used to be a link to IPC test board suppliers at IPC.org .
> >>>
> >>> Is there still a link there somewhere?
> >>>
> >>> I couldn't find it today
> >>>
> >>> Rich Kraszewski /Plexus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ____________________________________________________________________
> >>> __ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> >>> service.
> >>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> >>> [log in to unmask]
> >>> ____________________________________________________________________
> >>> __
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _____________________________________________________________________
> >> _ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> >> service.
> >> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >> _____________________________________________________________________
> >> _
> >>
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> > For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> > [log in to unmask]
> > ________________
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
