TECHNET Archives

June 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Burke <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, John Burke <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:29:50 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
For completed assemblies which may or may not be cased.

Reason for the question is as stated that we have many differing requirements normally from customers which vary widely even though the target equipment is the same....8-(

The test we actually carry out internally are fairly extreme given the typically benighn environment into which they are put.

Just wanted a quick straw poll on others test parameters

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Hillman
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 9:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Thermal Cycle Testing

Hi John - are we talking about thermal cycling of assemblies for solder joint/design integrity or thermal cycling of boards for laminate integrity?
The IPC-9701 specification covers the thermal cycling of assemblies and is commonly used.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]


On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:13 AM, John Burke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Good morning !!
>
>
>
> A question came up on reliability testing.
>
>
>
> Typically PCBA's are thermally cycled as a part of reliability testing 
> usually for 1000 cycles.
>
>
>
> What is the group's experience for non-military thermal cycling ranges?.
>
>
>
> I am often asked to use 0 - 100c sometimes -40 to 85c and sometimes 
> various other thermal cycles picked from the JEDEC standard.
>
>
>
> What is the groups experience for this?. I am trying to establish "normal"
> practice.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2