TECHNET Archives

May 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 May 2016 09:59:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Good morning all,

One of the IPC groups that I am leading is presently wrestling with the
issue of minor vs. major change.  Generally along the lines that if you
have a baselined or qualified manufacturing process, how much can that
process change before it needs to be re-baselined or re-qualified?
Sometimes this is referred to as Level 1 vs. Level 2 change.

So far, every quality documentation system that I have looked at, like
AS9100, ISO9000, etc., gets really fuzzy and uses vague terms when you
approach this issue.  Most of these documentation systems have change
better defined for products, but get extremely fuzzy and extremely vague
about manufacturing processes.

This forum has a lot of very smart, very experienced people. How would you
differentiate a minor change, which would not impact form fit or function,
from a major change, which "could/would" impact form fit or function?

And I want all you lurkers to come out of the woodwork on this one.

Doug Pauls
Principal Materials and Process Engineer
Rockwell Collins


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2