TECHNET Archives

May 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 May 2016 08:08:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
(1) assume the area is not encaped
(2) the flux residue (no clean) are not gummy, (most likely not).
I think you should see it (but cross section is better if you know  
which area to look for after the dye and pry).
my 2 cents.
    jk
On May 26, 2016, at 7:13 AM, Bev Christian wrote:

> Technetters,
> Have any of you ever seen or heard of a case where someone carried  
> out a dye
> and pry procedure and found the red dye inside the board after the pry
> portion of the activity? Let us assume that the person doing this  
> carried
> out the procedure and adequately dried the dye before doing the  
> prying part.
> :)
>
> Regards,
> Bev
> CALCE
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud  
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or  
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2