TECHNET Archives

April 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:32:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
Or Disco Inferno - Burn Baby Burn.

Disco Lives Hillman Disco Lives.................

OK, off to find my morning Dew.....


Doug Pauls
Principal Materials and Process Engineer
Rockwell Collins

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Stadem, Richard D. <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Ooooh, wooooow, maaan, at least you weren't smoking a joint and listening
> to Iron Butterfly's Holy Smoke! Or were you?
>
> Odin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ed Popielarski
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 5:05 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] NTC RE: [TN] Fire damage: criteria for salvage
>
> Coincidentally, Pandora playing at my desk this moment was "Smoke on the
> Water" by Deep Purpole. How ironic!
>
> Ed Popielarski
> Engineering Manager
>
>
>                                970 NE 21st Ct.
>                               Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277
>
>                               Ph: 360-675-1322
>                               Fx: 206-624-0695
>                               Cl: 360-544-2289
>
>
>
>        “It's one kind of victory to slay a beast, move a mountain, and
> cross a chasm, but it's another kind altogether to realize that the beast,
> the mountain, and the chasm were of your own design.”
>
> https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 2:49 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Fire damage: criteria for salvage
>
> Hi Julie,
>
> I'm so sorry that you have experienced this, I know what you must be going
> through, because back in 1990 we experienced a fire out on the production
> floor. It occurred late Saturday night/ early Sunday morning. We had worked
> that Saturday and the inline aqueous cleaner we had was left on. We think
> some safety sensor had failed and allowed the heaters to stay powered even
> though the water had boiled out of the tanks, and they wound melting the
> cleaner down and setting it on fire:
>
> http://stevezeva.homestead.com/Comptronix_Fire.jpg
>
> There were about 6-8 sprinkler heads that were set off and they flooded
> the production floor and the offices at the front of the building. We had
> product at various stages of WIP and we had to salvage as much as we could.
> First we informed our customers of the fire, and what product might be
> affected. We still had our inline Detrex freon cleaner and we sent
> everything through the cleaner. Assemblies that we had a electrical test
> for were tested, and when all was said and done we only lost the boards
> that were sitting in tilt racks next to the cleaner. We had tons of work
> cleaning everything else up (microscopes, workstations, pick and place
> equipment, etc., etc...) including calling a salvage company to come in and
> clean up the production floor and office spaces after the sprinkler
> flooding. But you know, we got it done. We were back building boards the
> following Thursday....
>
> Steve
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for criteria to determine whether electronic equipment in
> > a warehouse fire is salvageable.  There's obvious melted, blackened
> > scrap and obvious pristine shrink-wrapped packing boxes that didn't
> > see heat, smoke or water.  But there's stuff inbetween.  We need to
> > make sure we have quality material, and need criteria to counter the
> > insurance company's assessment of what's unaffected.  Is there some
> > information we can leverage?  A consultant who knows this?  Thanks!
> > Julie
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
> --
>
>
> This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential, proprietary
> or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction,
> dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this
> e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
> original.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2