TECHNET Archives

April 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:03:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
Ohhhhhh I dunno George.  You just gotta know where to look.  Greg Vorhis,
Coastal Technical Services, is the disaster recovery business and he and I
have had some very interesting conversations about the residues you see in
various disaster scenarios.  He has characterized many of the residues by
ion chromatography and he really seems to know his stuff.


Doug Pauls
Principal Materials and Process Engineer
Rockwell Collins

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:37 PM, George Wenger <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Julie,
>
> My guess is that you aren't going to find a consultant who really knows
> and there probably isn't a lot of "Good" information to leverage.
>
> I think you need to make the determination on three things:
>
> If the product looks terrible - scrap it.
> If the product looks good and tests good - ship or use it.
> If the product doesn't look pristine or has some minor dis-coloration and
> test good - ship it or use it if your customer agrees.
>
> There shouldn't be any problem using product that is shrink-wrapped
> packaged and didn't see any heat, smoke or water but I would test all of
> the pristine product to make sure it is good.
>
> The decision to ship or use other product that might not be pristine but
> passes test needs to be made with the customers agreement.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> George
>
> George M. Wenger
> Failure Signature & Characterization Lab LLC
> 609 Cokesbury Road, High Bridge, NJ 08829
> (908) 638-8771 (Home) (732)-309-8964 (Cell)
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Julie Silk" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 3:45:53 PM
> Subject: [TN] Fire damage: criteria for salvage
>
> I'm looking for criteria to determine whether electronic equipment in a
> warehouse fire is salvageable. There's obvious melted, blackened scrap and
> obvious pristine shrink-wrapped packing boxes that didn't see heat, smoke
> or water. But there's stuff inbetween. We need to make sure we have quality
> material, and need criteria to counter the insurance company's assessment
> of what's unaffected. Is there some information we can leverage? A
> consultant who knows this? Thanks! Julie
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2