TECHNET Archives

April 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:55:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
agree, but you need to assess the design and see how much margin you  
have.  in addition, you need to know your temperature of shrinkwrap  
can sustain vs your PWB Tg.  Any polymeric substance on board?  etc.   
You might want to keep track  the S/N of the assembly, just in case.   
If there is a burn-in procedure for the product, I would take the  
marginally acceptable stuff do the burn-in and  test for parameters -  
monitoring  drift before and  after from performance  (critical)  
point of view.   you need design to help you out.  Ship  or not, is  
program mgr call (normally, not project engineer), that including   
financial impact risk  factor and  legal risk.  Hopefully, you got a  
good PM  will sign off on the dotted line.
(consultant usually not have the guts to do so).
         jk
On Apr 11, 2016, at 6:37 PM, George Wenger wrote:

> Julie,
>
> My guess is that you aren't going to find a consultant who really  
> knows and there probably isn't a lot of "Good" information to  
> leverage.
>
> I think you need to make the determination on three things:
>
> If the product looks terrible - scrap it.
> If the product looks good and tests good - ship or use it.
> If the product doesn't look pristine or has some minor dis- 
> coloration and test good - ship it or use it if your customer agrees.
>
> There shouldn't be any problem using product that is shrink-wrapped  
> packaged and didn't see any heat, smoke or water but I would test  
> all of the pristine product to make sure it is good.
>
> The decision to ship or use other product that might not be  
> pristine but passes test needs to be made with the customers  
> agreement.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> George
>
> George M. Wenger
> Failure Signature & Characterization Lab LLC
> 609 Cokesbury Road, High Bridge, NJ 08829
> (908) 638-8771 (Home) (732)-309-8964 (Cell)
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Julie Silk" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 3:45:53 PM
> Subject: [TN] Fire damage: criteria for salvage
>
> I'm looking for criteria to determine whether electronic equipment  
> in a warehouse fire is salvageable. There's obvious melted,  
> blackened scrap and obvious pristine shrink-wrapped packing boxes  
> that didn't see heat, smoke or water. But there's stuff inbetween.  
> We need to make sure we have quality material, and need criteria to  
> counter the insurance company's assessment of what's unaffected. Is  
> there some information we can leverage? A consultant who knows  
> this? Thanks! Julie
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud  
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or  
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2