TECHNET Archives

April 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:58:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (170 lines)
agree.
  jk
On Apr 8, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Ed Hare wrote:

> Hi Steve,
>
> +12V & -12V is 24 volts with a little prepreg layer in between.   
> Sounds like trouble.
>
> ------------------------
> Ed Hare
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>> On Apr 8, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi again Dave,
>>
>> So the PCB is a .090" thick, 8-layer board, the stack-up is this:
>>
>> Soldermask
>> Layer 1
>> ----------
>> Ground
>> ----------Pre-preg
>> Layer 3
>> ----------
>> +12V
>> ----------Pre-preg
>> -12V
>> ----------
>> Layer 6
>> ----------Pre-preg
>> Ground
>> ----------
>> Layer 8
>> Soldermask
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, David Hillman <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Steve - yes, you have enough physical details that a lab that  
>>> routinely
>>> conducts FA work on electronic assemblies (there are several who  
>>> are part
>>> of Technet) would have a reasonable chance of finding the root  
>>> cause. At a
>>> very minimum with the details you have on this issue, the  
>>> laboratory should
>>> be able to rule out possible root causes even if they can't find  
>>> a specific
>>> root cause. I didn't see any dendritic shorting - is the belief  
>>> that the
>>> shorting is internal to the pwb?
>>>
>>> Dave Hillman
>>> Rockwell Collins
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Steve Gregory  
>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good Morning All,
>>>>
>>>> We have an assembly that we build here for a customer that we  
>>>> built for
>>>> some time, over 2,000 assemblies. There have been some failures  
>>>> that our
>>>> customer has had field returns with that are beginning to  
>>>> escalate. There
>>>> have been 12 field failures that we know of. The failures are  
>>>> avionic
>>>> assemblies that have been in the field ranging from 111 days to  
>>>> 472 days.
>>>> The actual failures are internal +12V to -12V shorts and we need  
>>>> to know
>>>> why. I have two failed assemblies here. Here are a couple of  
>>>> external
>>>> photos of a via that shows the short:
>>>>
>>>> http://stevezeva.homestead.com/Internal_Short.jpg
>>>>
>>>> http://stevezeva.homestead.com/Internal_Short_Close.jpg
>>>>
>>>> So my question is, can a lab take these boards and examine them to
>>>> determine what the root cause actually is from the two  
>>>> assemblies that I
>>>> have, or does there need to be more samples? What is the range  
>>>> we should
>>>> expect to pay for this type of analysis?
>>>>
>>>> We're trying to work with our PCB vendor on this issue, but I  
>>>> have also
>>>> been asked by my boss to pursue this with a third party.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________ 
>>>> ___
>>>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud  
>>>> service.
>>>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or  
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________ 
>>>> ___
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended
>>>> recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential,  
>>>> proprietary
>>>> or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use,  
>>>> reproduction,
>>>> dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents  
>>>> of this
>>>> e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have  
>>>> received
>>>> this
>>>> email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
>>>> original.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________ 
>> _
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud  
>> service.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or  
>> [log in to unmask]
>> _____________________________________________________________________ 
>> _
>> -- 
>>
>>
>> This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended
>> recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential,  
>> proprietary
>> or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction,
>> dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents of  
>> this
>> e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have  
>> received this
>> email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
>> original.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud  
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or  
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2