TECHNET Archives

April 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:22:28 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (108 lines)
Hi team - a data point for the conversation: the EN plating has 1%-3%
elongation so its not very robust to bending stresses.

Dave

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> According to the best flex‎ guru I know any bending with ENIG is excessive.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vladimir
>
> SENTEC
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
>   Original Message
> From: Stadem, Richard D.
> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 10:13
> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Vladimir
> Subject: RE: [TN] ENIG on flexi PCBs
>
> What is the limit, and how do you define that?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Vladimir
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 9:10 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG on flexi PCBs
>
> I don't think E-Ni thickness has anything to do with the issue. Most
> probably the flex was bend over the limit. That's what we normally see from
> our customers.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vladimir
>
> ‎SENTEC
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
>   Original Message
> From: Mumtaz Bora
> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 10:05
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Reply To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
> Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG on flexi PCBs
>
> Hello Nigel, Cracking issues in flex can also occur based on the type of
> copper used for the traces. Is your supplier using rolled annealed copper
> or ED( electro deposited ) copper. Rolled annealed copper is preferred for
> flex circuits.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nigel Burtt
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 2:10 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] ENIG on flexi PCBs
>
> IPC-4552 requires 3-6um nickel, but does not appear to distinguish between
> rigid FR4 PCBs and flexible PCBs.
>
> A flexible interconnect PCB using ENIG with ZIF end connectors has been
> shown to be prone to track cracking near the ZIF ends. The supplier has
> suggested a lower thickness of nickel 1-3um rather than the IPC spec to
> would be beneficial to resolve this and tests on samples seem to bear this
> out.
>
> Does anyone have any experience of such a suggested modification of ENIG
> spec and that thinner nickel improves the resistance to stress-cracking for
> flexi tracks?
>
> In this specific application as there are no component soldering
> requirements so the thinner nickel under the gold does not lead to
> solderability concerns, but what would be the likely consequence on other
> flexi/flex-rigid designs with flexi ZIF connector ends and SMT components
> if a 1-3um thickness was imposed more generally? Increased likelihood of
> black-pad type defects?
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted, including attachments,
> is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and
> may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
> retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
> reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
> intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
> contact the sender and destroy any copies of this information.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2