TECHNET Archives

April 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:09:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
I don't think E-Ni thickness has anything to do with the issue. Most probably the flex was bend over the limit. That's what we normally see from our customers.

Regards,

Vladimir

‎SENTEC

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
  Original Message  
From: Mumtaz Bora
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 10:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG on flexi PCBs

Hello Nigel, Cracking issues in flex can also occur based on the type of copper used for the traces. Is your supplier using rolled annealed copper or ED( electro deposited ) copper. Rolled annealed copper is preferred for flex circuits.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nigel Burtt
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 2:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] ENIG on flexi PCBs

IPC-4552 requires 3-6um nickel, but does not appear to distinguish between rigid FR4 PCBs and flexible PCBs.

A flexible interconnect PCB using ENIG with ZIF end connectors has been shown to be prone to track cracking near the ZIF ends. The supplier has suggested a lower thickness of nickel 1-3um rather than the IPC spec to would be beneficial to resolve this and tests on samples seem to bear this out.

Does anyone have any experience of such a suggested modification of ENIG spec and that thinner nickel improves the resistance to stress-cracking for flexi tracks?

In this specific application as there are no component soldering requirements so the thinner nickel under the gold does not lead to solderability concerns, but what would be the likely consequence on other flexi/flex-rigid designs with flexi ZIF connector ends and SMT components if a 1-3um thickness was imposed more generally? Increased likelihood of black-pad type defects?
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this information.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2