TECHNET Archives

April 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:35:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Hi Lawrence - is the CEM-1 brittle or just not thermally robust?

Dave

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Lawrence Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> CEM3 can be used. Cheap, easily damaged. Takes some practice compared to
> FR4.
> Never used CEM1 for anything other than unplated holes. Jumper wires used
> to route traces.
>
> MPH <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >Hello everyone,    We are challenge on PTH application for CEM-1
> material, does anyone has any ideas on this?
> >
> >Best regardsPhoil. M
> >
> >______________________________________________________________________
> >This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> >For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> >______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2