I have no personal experience with CEM-1. I have with CEM-3. It is very
similar to (low Tg) FR-4. But, I easily found some good information with a
google search.
http://www.dfrsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Characterization-of-CEM-1-Boards.pdf
Good luck.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Lawrence Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> CEM3 can be used. Cheap, easily damaged. Takes some practice compared to
> FR4.
> Never used CEM1 for anything other than unplated holes. Jumper wires used
> to route traces.
>
> MPH <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >Hello everyone,    We are challenge on PTH application for CEM-1
> material, does anyone has any ideas on this?
> >
> >Best regardsPhoil. M
> >
> >______________________________________________________________________
> >This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> >For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> >______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________