TECHNET Archives

March 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: ROSE testing
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:35:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
I would suggest you look at the Contaminometer CM22 from Gen3.  I expect
Graham will contact you soon.
On Mar 30, 2016 5:33 PM, "Louis Hart" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> TechNetters, a 25-year-old Omegameter is at best comatose and at worst
> defunct.  Please recommend a replacement, or offer other advice you may
> have. Testing must be in conformance with IPC TM-650, method 2.3.25. Thanks
> for any information. Louis Hart
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2