TECHNET Archives

February 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:37:50 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Check IPC-A600 which is for PCBs.
Submit pics of the sections if you want an opinion.

Brs,
Gerry

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


Fellow TechNetters:

   In the above stated standard DON"T see anything that refer to a defect from the desmear process which created a bow/flex, hour glass shape, on the copper hole wall from uncleansed debris.   No lead will be inserted in this PTH.   Is this type of anomaly acceptable.   I don't suspect that the laminate is FR4 at this time.   Perhaps later will identify.

Victor,


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2