TECHNET Archives

December 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:04:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
dip flux works well (you might want to get low solid or low residue flux)
if you have good pick and place machine and good reflow profile... at
least it used to work well...
         jk
> Dear Technetters:
>
> In reviewing the IPC 7095 BGA guidelines I noticed a mention of liquid
> based fluxes for BGA rework. Has anyone heard of liquid fluxes being
> robust
> enough for Sn63 or lead-free rework processes?
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
> --
> Thanks
>
> Bob Wettermann/BEST
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2