TECHNET Archives

December 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:46:43 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Hi Bob - yes, liquid fluxes do work for BGA rework processes but they are
extremely messy and require very good thermal profile/temperature controls
otherwise you end up with nonactivated flux under the BGA. That situation
usually ends in a corrosion problem. My recommendation is to use a flux
paste or a dippable solder paste for BGA rework tasks.


Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]


On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Bob Wettermann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear Technetters:
>
> In reviewing the IPC 7095 BGA guidelines I noticed a mention of liquid
> based fluxes for BGA rework. Has anyone heard of liquid fluxes being robust
> enough for Sn63 or lead-free rework processes?
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
> --
> Thanks
>
> Bob Wettermann/BEST
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2