TECHNET Archives

November 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"MacFadden, Todd" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, MacFadden, Todd
Date:
Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:47:17 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I have heard that stacking microvias on resin-filled buried vias can pose a reliability risk due to resin expansion at high temperatures, which can cause the copper cap to lift off the buried via, potentially causing an open. Here is one source that describes this risk:


http://pcb.iconnect007.media/index.php/article/66028/reid-on-reliability-lifted-pad-stacked-microvia-failure/66031/?skin=pcb


Nevertheless, this type of construction is plainly sanctioned in IPC-2226 (HDI Type III), so I wonder how serious this risk is, and/or if this is something the IPC-2226 Committee (D-41?) is planning to address.

Does anyone have any experience with or knowledge of this risk? How serious is the risk? Do you have internal rules/guidelines specifically to avoid this structure? (I'm referring only to stacked vias atop resin-filled buried vias; my understanding is that stacked, Cu-filled uvias are not a reliability risk. Correct assumption?)



Thanks in advance,
Todd MacFadden

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2