TECHNET Archives

November 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 12:08:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
your design group should be able to tell you what is the engage/dis-engage
time plus safety factor they use before select the connector - and
determine what is you want to do going to eat up safety margin, potential
risk... if it is not intended to be replaced by design.  not us - at least
not me.
            jk
> All:
>
> Need some help determining if we can remove a press fit connector from a
> PCB and replace it with a new press fit connector? PCB plating is ENIG.
> This is a Class 3 assembly. I can't seem to find it in any IPC document.
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Steve Vargas
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2