TECHNET Archives

November 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Question on IPC-2222A table 9-5
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:23:46 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
LOL!

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of James Head
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 3:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Question on IPC-2222A table 9-5

In IPC-2222 (i.e. the previous version) it's "Maximum hole to minimum lead diameter" and "Minimum hole to maximum lead diameter".  I don't have issue A in front of me here.

You may have found one of the deliberate mistakes the IPC included to keep people that look for mistakes happy :-)

James

James Head BEng CID+ MIIE MIET
Senior PCB CAD Engineer
Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
172 Brook Drive
Milton Park
OX14 4SD
Telephone: +44 (1235) 557700 ext. 7885
E-mail: [log in to unmask]


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2