TECHNET Archives

November 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 05:02:49 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Deng RongJun <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Question on IPC-2222A table 9-5
From:
Deng RongJun <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
Hi all:

IPC-2222A table 9-5 have defined PTH Diameter to Lead Diameter Relationships. 
The relationships described as  " Minimum hole to minimum lead diameter ", and " Minimum hole to maximum lead diameter ".
But why not  "Maximum hole to minimum lead diameter" and " Minimum hole to maximum lead diameter "? 
Is it a clerical mistake?

 
RongJun Deng


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2