TECHNET Archives

October 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:29:10 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Thanks! I am used to referencing 4552, and did not know the plating information is also in 6012.

-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Sullivan [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:26 PM
To: 'TechNet E-Mail Forum'; Stadem, Richard D.
Subject: RE: [TN] ENIG VS. ammonia

6012 references you to 4552. I believe the table in 6012 comes from the values in 4552.

Craig Sullivan
Manufacturing Engineer / IT Administrator
Phone:  (607) 266-0480 x115
Fax:  (607) 266-0482
Email: [log in to unmask]
Web:  www.mplinc.com

MPL, Inc.
41 Dutch Mill Road  |  Ithaca  |  NY  |  14850 P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 11:29 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG VS. ammonia

Just a minor nitpicking. 
The correct reference for the definition of ENIG is IPC-4552. I am not sure if the plating thicknesses are defined within IPC-6012.
But the result is the same; if only 60 uinches is present, it is not ENIG. If it was intended to be ENIG per IPC-4552 on the fabrication drawing note, then the PWBs are non-compliant. RTV to vendor for credit and corrective action.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ed Popielarski
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 10:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG VS. ammonia

Can't attach anything on Technet (server strips it) but you can look it up here:

http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1510&L=TechNet&P=R3873&1=TechNet&9=A&J=on&d=No+Match%3BMatch%3BMatches&z=4


Ed Popielarski
Engineering Manager


                               970 NE 21st Ct.
                              Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277

                              Ph: 360-675-1322
                              Fx: 206-624-0695
                              Cl: 949-581-6601



       “It's one kind of victory to slay a beast, move a mountain, and cross a chasm, but it's another kind altogether to realize that the beast, the mountain, and the chasm were of your own design.”
https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Vladimir Igoshev
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 10:25 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG VS. ammonia

I guess you forgot to attach the thread :-)

Vladimir

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
  Original Message
From: Ed Popielarski
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 00:27
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG VS. ammonia

This thread in this forum: 

Re: [TN] ENIG coating durability

Ed Popielarski
Engineering Manager


970 NE 21st Ct.
Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277

Ph: 360-675-1322
Fx: 206-624-0695
Cl: 949-581-6601



“It's one kind of victory to slay a beast, move a mountain, and cross a chasm, but it's another kind altogether to realize that the beast, the mountain, and the chasm were of your own design.”
https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Vladimir Igoshev
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 3:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG VS. ammonia

Hi Ed,

Black pad would have nothing to do with amonia. How do you know it's Black Pad in a fist place?

Regards,

Vladimir

SENTEC‎

‎

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
  Original Message
From: David Hillman
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 23:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: TechNet E-Mail Forum
Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG VS. ammonia

Hi Ed - if the root cause of the attack is the peelable mask, then you should be able to reproduce the same issue on any ENIG board and not just this specific lot/supplier. There are lots of possible root causes for what you described - plating issues, cleaning issues, etc.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I Have a batch of boards showing what I believe to be black pad. This 
> is surfacing at thru hole (solderability, some pads are turning 
> orange). One person suggested the peelable solder mask contains 
> ammonia and this is what is causing it. I disagree.
>
> Suggestions or comments?
>
> Ed Popielarski
> Engineering Manager
>
> [cid:[log in to unmask]]
> 970 NE 21st Ct.
> Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277
>
> Ph: 360-675-1322
> Fx: 206-624-0695
> Cl: 949-581-6601
>
>
>
> "It's one kind of victory to slay a beast, move a mountain, and cross 
> a chasm, but it's another kind altogether to realize that the beast, 
> the mountain, and the chasm were of your own design."
>
> https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&s
> pn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2